|
PRESS REACTION
Compiled by Matthew Lee © 2005
WARNING - THIS GUIDE CONTAINS SPOILERS
THE LISTENER - September 12th, 1985
Article by John Naughton
Keyhole of Hell:
The same could be said for Tom Howard, the eponymous hero of Howards’ Way
(BBC-1), the latest serial on the lives and harassed times of the
Jag-owning classes. The story-line is approximately as follows. Clean-cut,
middle-40ish Howard (Maurice Colbourne) is a highly-paid aircraft designer
who has just been made redundant. He lives in a very Sanderson villa on
the South Coast with glossy wife Jan (Jan Harvey) and two happy,
over-indulged kids. Tom’s one great love in life is sailing the boat which
he designed, which is just an excuse for the cameramen to practise their
Martini-advertisement shots. Fortunately, the sun always shines in BBC-1
serials about middle-class life, so the cameraman can always shoot into
the sun. Just like the Martini cameramen do. Meanwhile, just down the
road, ol’ Jack Rolfe’s boatyard is rapidly going bust, which is not
surprising given that it is managed by Jack (Glyn Owen), who hasn’t had a
new idea since 1908. He does, however, have a sexy, ambitious – and single
– daughter, Avril (Susan Gilmore), who sees right through him. Jack offers
Tom Howard a stake in the yard, in return for his redundancy money. This
will, in due course, take Tom’s money to the laundry and his weary frame
to Avril’s bed. For this is a Kentucky Fried Series, in which ingredients
are selected by computer and blended in a Moulinex. Just to underline the
point, Mrs Howard, who has the makings of a promising shrew, works for the
local cad and lecher. You can tell he’s a bad because he drives a BMW. He,
spotting that she cannot stomach the idea of losing life’s little
luxuries, offers her a bigger job, and will have her in bed before she can
splice a mainbrace, or whatever it is one does with mainbraces. Etc, etc.
What’s objectionable about all this is not that it isn’t well done – in
its way – but that it’s so safe and predictable. I can think of several
series along these lines over the last three years – all centred on the
idea of a middle-aged man’s sudden change of life or direction, and all
mixing sex, money, Jags and BMWs in equal proportions. Who watches this
stuff, besides television critics? Is it television’s answer to the
problem of executive redundancy, encouraging sacked managers to abandon
their marital couches and sink their golden handshakes in new enterprises
– rather as the Ministry of Agriculture tries to encourage modern farming
practices by having them mentioned on The Archers?
THE LISTENER - October 17th, 1985
Article by John Naughton
Autumn Leaves:
This autumn season is all very well for the rest of you, but for us
critics it is bloody murder. I mean, you can just plug into the first
glossy episode of a much-hyped serial and then tune out for the duration.
You can sleep in front of the television, or read the memoirs of Ms Sara
Keays, or write letters to your grandmother in a fine Italian hand. But we
critics have to watch the damned stuff week in, week out, just in case
something happens. Take Howards’ Way (BBC-1), for example, an everyday
tale of the Jag-owning classes. Set in Hampshire-by-the-sea, where the sun
always shines, and the yacht clubs are full of BMW-driving cads, and the
middle-classes are so bored they even yawn while screwing one another, it
features Maurice Colbourne as Tom Howard, a redundant aircraft designer
with a passion for sailing boats and a nice line in craggy wholesomeness.
Tom has sunk his lot into a bankrupt boatyard, lured in by the beautiful,
sexy and ambitious Avril Rolfe (Susan Gilmore). Meanwhile, shrewish,
upmarket Mrs Howard (Jan Harvey) works for the local lecher, who sees her
as the bit of class he’s always wanted and plans to have her as such. From
the outset, it was clear that they would all wind up in one another’s
beds. It’s taking an age, though: they are not so much jumping into bed as
crawling towards it, like a column of earwigs marching through treacle.
The root cause of the problem is structural, namely that of too many
sideshows chasing too few slots. There are simply too many subplots, too
many “characters” to be developed, too much business to be transacted in
the space of fifty minutes. Apart altogether from the matter of Tom Howard
and the boatyard, for example, there is the impending affair with Avril,
his partner’s affair with his mother-in-law, his daughter’s problems with
yacht-club lechers, his wife’s impending flutter with her snake of an
employer, his son’s search for fulfillment and organic food, not to
mention Polly Urquhart’s relentless promiscuity, her husband’s
homosexuality and her daughter’s quest for commitment.
THE LISTENER - November 14th, 1985
Article by John Naughton
Bucket Cop:
Thos who laid odds with me that Howards’ Way (BBC-1) couldn’t get any
worse may now be seen wandering shirtless up and down the Marylebone High
Street. Their great mistake was to underestimate the lengths to which
scriptwriters will go when they’ve run out of ideas. The dramatic
potential of Tarrant, Hants, having been temporarily exhausted, Mrs Howard
(Jan Harvey) was dispatched to sunny Cannes, where she communed with
Malcolm Jamieson, who played a joke Frenchman in the great tradition of
Inspector Clouseau. She stayed in a bedroom furnished by Cecil B De Mille
out of Louis Quatorze throw-outs before eventually succumbing to the
greasy charms of Ken Masters (Stephen Yardley), the BMW-driving cad and
lecher. “I’m frightened, Ken,” said she, before yielding to his hot
caress, adding that she was a married woman, which Ken, being her
employer, must have known already. “Do you know,” he replied,
conversationally, “I love you so much it almost hurts”. This is the kind
of thing that gives superficiality a bad name. The only thing to be said
about Howards’ Way is that if all the viewers who sleep through it were
laid end to end, they would be much more comfortable.
THE LISTENER - August 28th, 1986
Article by John Naughton
Pneumatic Tryers:
A would-be Hollywood starlet of pneumatic physique was once picked up from
a casting couch by a big-time mogul who promised her a part in the movies
if only she would remove her underwear. Having had his way with her, he
then, in the time-honoured way of these things, tried to drop her, only to
find that she had made a video of his performance, including close-up
footage of acts which would constitute criminal offences in several
states. Accordingly, he was obliged to make good his promises. The only
trouble was that the lady had no acting talents at all; even walk-on parts
were beyond her. So in desperation, the mogul bought into a travelling
stage production of The Diary Of Anne Frank on condition that she got to
play the lead. Her performance was such, a local newspaper critic claimed,
that when the Gestapo finally came hammering on the door, the audience
rose as one man and roared: “She’s in the attic, she’s in the attic!”.
“Pshaw,” I hear you say, “he’s making that up. Nobody could be that bad”.
Well, I got news for you, folks. For Howards’ Way (BBC-1) is back for
another series, with a cast which makes our pneumatic heroine look like
Joan Plowright. On the grounds that those who saw it before will have
forgotten what it was about, last Sunday evening saw the screening of the
last episode of the first series, in preparation for what is to come in
the next. Here is the story so far. By the banks of the Hamble, deep in
Gin and Tonic country, there is a colony of sailing folk who are
permanently dressed as if about to attend a wedding. The “action” revolves
around the Howard family, who are fundamentally nice people thrown by
circumstances and without navigational aids into a maelstrom of sex, money
and property development. Papa Tom (Maurice Colbourne), the eponymous
hero, for example, sinks everything in a bankrupt boatyard, hoping to
rescue it by bringing his engineering design skills to bear upon yacht
design. Whereupon, he falls into bed with beautiful temptress Avril Rolfe
(Susan Gilmore) who shivers his timbers no end. Meanwhile, wife Jan (Jan
Harvey) has fallen into the erotic clutches of dastardly Ken Masters
(Stephen Yardley) who drives a BMW and probably has a carphone and
combines the looks of Edith Sitwell with the brains of Darth Vader. And
the well-appointed daughter Lynne Howard (Tracey Childs), who likewise
cannot resist a cad, is hopelessly in love with rich, unscrupulous Charles
Frere (Tony Anholt). The last series closed with the distraught Lynne
discovering Frere in flagrante with a corsetiered floozie and falling into
the Hamble. The question is: did she survive? Only time and the next
episode will tell, but my guess is that her aforementioned physique will
not let her down. Or drown. The apparent success of this series suggests
that British television is learning fast from the Dallas genre. Since the
British super-rich – pace Fortune (LWT) – are not as spectacular as Texas
oil families, the trick is to find a family setting for soap which is
glamorous enough (in British terms) to attract the punters, but
sufficiently culture-specific to be credible to the inhabitants of
Huddersfield. The large crowds reportedly attracted by the filming of this
new series, together with the appears of Jan Harvey on Wogan (BBC-1),
suggests that the formula works, even if it leaves your critic lost for
words.
THE LISTENER - October 16th, 1986
Article by John Naughton
Tories Of Our Time:
“It is not true,” saig a chap I once met in an autobahn Rasthof, “that the
Germans are bad drivers. It is just that they hit everything they aim at”.
I am beginning to think that the same kind of analysis should be applied
to Howards’ Way, for, having started by assuming that a series so
unutterably contrived, vulgar and unconvincing could only have been
concocted by some ghastly accident, I am now convinced that the whole
thing is intentional. That, in other words, the BBC department responsible
for these things set about the task of devising a recipe which would
maximise the audience “take” at eight o’clock on a Sunday night much as an
earlier group planned and executed EastEnders to meet the Corporation’s
manifest need for an answer to Coronation Street. The product which
maximises the take in question is a glitzy soap, a tale of ordinary
yachting folk told against the glittering backdrop of the Hamble estuary.
Of course Howards’ Way caters to a different taste than does Coronation
Street, just as EastEnders caters to a younger audience. In doing so, the
saga of the Howard clan sheds some light on the changing social structure
of Britain. Granada’s “street” is psychically rooted in the past, and is
physically and dramatically located in the sunset zone – the wasteland
North of Watford, with its decaying cities, derelict industries and the
crisp-bloated inhabitants of Mrs Currie’s imagination. In contrast, both
of BBC soaps are situated in the prospering South. Although EastEnders
portrays the lower end of the social spectrum, its characters still live
in a world of prospects, where prosperity lies just around a gentrified
corner, if not within easy reach. And Howards’ Way completes the picture,
by featuring the middle classes and the hard-faced men who have done well
out of the recession and out of Mrs Hacksaw’s regime. If the BBC feels a
need to reply to Mr Norman Tebbit’s allegations of anti-Tory bias, then I
think the Corporation should simply point to Howards’ Way and then rest
its case. For here are portrayed the Tories of our time, not as idle,
bloated capitalists grinding the faces of the poor, but as ordinary folk
going about their businesses of property development, apre-sail couture
and capitalist reconstruction. (They do, of course, also climb in and out
of one another’s beds rather a lot, but then so too do some of the Prime
Minister’s favourites). As in a Tory party political broadcast, the
central characters of Howards’ Way are seen as ambitious and resourceful
people who take risks and mortgage their houses in order to expand
businesses and provide jobs. And when – as in the case of the dreadful Ken
Masters – they venture beyond the letter of the law, they are overcome
with remorse, blame the villains they knocked around with in the dark days
before everyone drove a BMW, and – most importantly – lose their shirts.
It is hard to imagine a more moralistic tale. Or a less convincing one.
THE LISTENER - November 27th, 1986
Article by John Naughton
The Fall Of The House Of Howard:
It is always a mistake to open one’s mail. No sooner had I pointed out
that Howards’ Way was the perfect answer to charges of anti-Tory bias in
the BBC, on the grounds that it showed the Jaguar-driving, après-sail
crowd in the best of all possible lights, than someone writes in
triumphantly pointing out that everything had begun to go wrong for these
glittering residents of gin-and-tonic country. “Explain that if you will,”
crowed my correspondent. Well, of course, in one sense, she is right.
Everything fell apart, the centre did fail under pressure, with fatal
results. The Mermaid Yard was served with an enormous writ for damages.
The Rolfes, father and daughter, did turn on Tom, suing him for negligence
and worse. Abby did take up with a psychopath. And although Jan eventually
saw through Dirty Ken, and found happiness with her pneumatic daughter and
the latter’s pigtailed Frenchman, their cosy world was shattered by his
cruel fate at the hands of a speedboat lunatic. End of (current) series.
Now, on the face of it, these sad events might be seen as evidence of a
radical determination to show that, in the end, the Jaguar-driving classes
get their just desserts. But we structuralists are not content with such
superficial interpretations. For one thing, there is the small problem of
ratings to be considered. It transpires that Howards’ Way is exceedingly
popular with the punters, for reasons which defy explanation. Accordingly,
there will be further series, for which vast audiences are expected – and
required. It was therefore necessary to conclude the present run with a
veritable avalanche of catastrophies to whet the audience’s appetite for
what comes next. Much the same formula is regularly used by Dallas and
Dynasty – the latter going to the extreme of massacring the outgoing cast
at the end of the last series. But this is merely a dramatic device in
order to ensure continued interest in the follow-on series, in which no
doubt Tom will claw his way back from bankruptcy and into Avril’s bed, Jan
will rebuild her shattered fashion business and Lynne will find
consolation as a model for wetsuits or, possibly, airships. And the
underlying message of all this? Why, it is that capitalists are
resourceful, tough, resilient folk who come back from the dead. Just like
Mrs Hacksaw says they are.
THE LISTENER - May 12th, 1988
Article by Libby Purves
Schlockwatch – Howards’ Way:
I have these very high ideals about television. A window on the world. A
sacred trust. Attenborough, gorillas, Newsnight, Cathy Come Home, Blue
Peter. There is a great deal of rubbish around, one admits that: but
nobody is physically forced to watch cop shows or Henry Kelly. One picks
and chooses, does one not? The Discriminating Viewer, one is … So what am
I doing, week after winter week, refusing invitations and fretting about
video timers, bundling children early to bed, taking telephones off hooks
and microwaving bagfuls of orange gunk, merely in order to become an
immobile couch-potato, transfixed by Howards’ Way? How can I, who proudly
boasts of never having seen Joan Collins moving, be enslaved to this
inexcusable Anglo-Dallas, this hollow, hangling melodrama of showdowns and
shoulder-pads, where birth and death and ruin are all met with the same
set of facial tics beneath immaculately unswept eyeshadow? Why do I mourn
when it goes off the air after each series, and why – like a heroin addict
putting up with methadone – do I unerringly plug myself in to anything
which feels a bit like it, such as the equally mad, overdressed, hectic
and unbelievable Campaign? What have they done to me? I suppose I first
watched Howards’ Way for the sailing. We like boats, in our house, and the
ones we normally encounter seem to be crewed by nice middling sort of
people, like waterborne Archers. You know, people in grubby sweaters, with
children and dogs. Indeed, I wondered how on earth they were going to get
any human drama out of the ruck of yachtspeople, since in real life we
tend to be extremely level-headed, tea-brewing people, our cosiness
compensating for the stagey howling of the wind and sea beyond the harbour
wall. But Howards’ Way, it turned out, is not really about boats at all.
It is about boardrooms and beds. The first series, in case you missed it,
was a simple tale about Tom – a graying aircraft-designer with as House
And Garden lifestyle – who blows his redundancy money buying into a ratty
old boatyard run by a lovable alcoholic; there is his estranged wife, Jan,
who rapidly turns into a womenswear tycoon; their adult children, Lynne
the pneumatic blonde and Leo the Friend of the Earth; a frightfully wicked
entrepreneur called Charles Frere who seduces maidens and bulldozes
marshes, and other assorted inhabitants of a very uppity little town on
the River Hamble, called Tarrant. We were charmed from the outset. Not
only did all the female characters change their costume and blusher for
every scene, but the sailing shots – considering that their technical
adviser was lying on the cockpit floor, steering desperately from
underneath – were a miracle of ham art. Tom Howard, in particular, had a
knack of clutching the tiller while fixing the horizon with a steely gaze
as if there might be an autocue out there somewhere. Lynne would haul in
the spinnaker by the novel method of running the rope sensually across the
top of her bare, bronzed thigh, yet it never left a mark. Back in the
boatyard, the cast would saw away frenziedly for hours at very thin bits
of wood, and deliver themselves of wonderful technical speeches. These
went something like: “Got time for lunch, Tom?” “No – I’m supervising the
installation of the stringers on the new design, using the new West Epoxy
system lately developed in California”. Or: “Jack – I’m telling you – this
new Polyurethane Foam Sandwich Construction is the way forward for us!
It’s the Future!”. Meanwhile, characters climbed almost absentmindedly in
and out of one another’s beds, as if searching for the ultimate Foam
Sandwich partner. The series ended with Lynne fleeing down the marina
pontoons from her faithless tycoon lover, biffing her head on a
mooring-cleat and falling senseless into the briny. They left her there
for eight months. Suspense mounted, or not. Eventually, the series came
back with an amnesiac Lynne and a hilarious French fashion designer called
Claude Dupont. By the end of the second series, Claude (pronounced Clod)
had been minced up in a powerboat propeller after founding a fashion
empire with Jan, who had by this time left the bed of the balding-but-sexy
yacht chandler Ken, who instead was busy knocking off his new partner’s
wife. Meanwhile, Abby (did I mention Abby? The pregnant one?) turned out
to be the bastard daughter of none other than – gritty, grit, tic, tic –
Charles Frere, the baddie! Scenes are frenetically intercut, to prevent
the listener rolling off the sofa in paroxysms of laughter or grief, or
perhaps because the cameras had perforce to swing rapidly away from the
actors before they, too, collapsed. There is a lot in this latter theory:
I had the pleasure of actually meeting Maurice Colbourne, who plays Tom
Howard, and finding him to be a perfectly serious and decent actor,
classically trained in the tradition of truth-to-life; he was very loyal
to his scriptwriters, but mentioned in passing that there is, among actors
in such productions, an accepted way of handling certain particularly
dreadful lines (“Jan, Jan – we’re drifting apart, aren’t we?”). What you
do is to distract the audience from the words with a bit of business. “You
twitch your hair, or move your cup rather loudly”. Characters change
radically from series to series – Charles Frere mutated from arch-bastard
to victim of a tyrannical father, Leo Howard somehow managed to stop being
a Friend of the Earth and became a pollutant wet-bike salesman without a
word of remorse. Yet despite this blatant cheating, the plots can be seen
coming: as they round each corner, their monstrous misshapen shadows are
cast before them. If someone is going to commit suicide, you get special
close shots of their eyes to warn you. If a man is going to be killed, you
can be quite confident that he will leave an illegitimate daughter or a
vengeful wife to mess up his business empire. The joy of this sort of
schlock-drama is that anything could happen to these frightful people, and
the viewer does not care: pity and terror are entirely suspended. When
Claude was minced and Lynne widowed, we merely admired the gelatine tears
and hummed along with the closing music. If you are the sort of concerned
viewer who frets nightly about Nicaragua and the ozone layer, this is very
therapeutic; there is a fearful, guilty joy in being harmlessly callous,
just for an hour. These people are far too nattily dressed to attract
sympathy. One laughs and turns down the thumb, like a Roman emperor. |