|
ALIEN vs PREDATOR
Film review by Lee Medcalf
Starring:
Lance Henriksen, Ewen Bremner, Sanaa Lathan, Raoul Bova
Director:
Paul W.S. Anderson
From
the moment that Danny Glover stepped inside the Predator spaceship and saw
what was nothing more than a 20th Century Fox in joke hanging
on the wall as a trophy, fans around the globe have been waiting for the
inevitable showdown between two of cinemas most enduring monsters.
Of course comic fanboys
have known for some time what was going on when
HR Giger’s biomechanoid ran into Arnie’s otherworldly hunter opponent, but
still filmgoers wanted to see the two monsters duke it out on the big
screen. And so, after years of gestation (pun intended), Paul WS Anderson
(the WS is the important distinction between the director of Event
Horizon and the director of Magnolia) brings the big uglys
together.
The story is a simple
one: a team of humans, led by Charles Weyland (Millennium’s Lance
Henriksen), are assembled to go investigate a pyramid that has been
spotted by a satellite under the ice of Antarctica. The pyramid seems to
be the product of several cultures. When they get there, they find that
they have unwittingly stumbled into a “proving ground” for a group of
young predators, who are there as a rite of passage, to hunt the ultimate
prey: the Alien.
This is almost a
too-good-to-be-true setup for a film; high in concept, apparently bridging
the gap between two franchises. Also, with its modern day setting, it acts
as a sequel to Predator 2 and a Prequel to Alien.
And sadly it is too good
to be true, because once the film has been hastily set up, what follows is
a collection of clumsy homages to the original movies: check out the first
time we see the Predator ship, and watch as the whole scene copies the
opening moments of Alien as the ship’s computer wakes up and
projects on images on to the helmets. There’s exposition by the bucketful
as every human character gets to say just enough to push the movie along
and explain everything. Worst of all is the bland action.
The effects are, as you
would expect nowadays, of a reasonable quality, the CG Alien Queen on the
rampage is a particular high point, bringing back memories of the T-Rex in
Jurassic Park, but, as I have said many times before, good effects
do not a good film make. The acting is serviceable, with no particular
actor standing out from the crowd. This is mainly due to the poor script:
not so much filled with dialogue as chunks of exposition, “What is it
doing?” “Ahh, it’s a rite of passage… now things make sense” is a good
example. Along with rushed pacing, this leaves no chance for the
character’s motivations to become clear, or indeed any character
development to speak of, beyond Ewan Bremner occasionally mentioning his
kids.
This in turn means that
when heads start rolling and chests start bursting you couldn’t give a
stuff who buys the farm and who survives. But it’s the two main
protagonists, the Alien and the Predator, that are worst served by this
film. If someone at 20th Century Fox expects this to jumpstart
a new franchise, or to reinvigorate the original franchises, they should
think again.
Once again, the Alien
has devolved from the terrifying killing machine of the original film,
further down the movie monster food chain, now its just A.N.Other beasty
that repeatedly needs killing off… simply put it’s now merely dull cannon
fodder. The treatment of this fantastic creation is nothing short of
criminal, and now, thanks to this film, and the rightly-lambasted,
ironically-titled Alien Resurrection the Alien is simply not scary
anymore. The Predator fares little better. It’s original moral hunting
code is discarded for ninety-percent of the film, so it can simply be used
to bump off Aliens and humans alike, with new weapons and lazy action set
pieces. Only in the final twenty minutes does the writer, Paul WS Anderson
(again), remember that the Predator only kills those that can fight back
(i.e. those who are armed), or those who attack it…
The
blame for this debacle of a movie lands squarely at the feet of Paul WS
Anderson. He seems incapable of simply pacing a movie to build tension. A
perfect example is those poor souls who are hit in the face with a
facehugger, are infected, wake up and have an Alien shooting out of their
chest in less than three minutes of the movies own internal time, which
plays a big part in the film as an event happens every ten minutes, so we
are told. It’s lazy, it’s stupid and it discards all four previous films,
just so that we can dive into the action. Anderson, who directed
Resident Evil and the detestable Soldier, has, in Alien
vs Predator,
made a film which often copies the original films in shots and scripting,
but yet seems to lack the knowledge of what made those shots great. For
example, the Predator taking its mask off in the original is copied to the
frame, as is the by-now de-facto “up close teeth and drool” shot of the
Alien, but neither of these shots, nor the rest of the film, can compare
to the originals.
Perhaps would be unfair
to compare this film to the originals, if it wasn’t for the fact that
there is nothing original in this movie at all, and the only thing that
has any chance of originality is the action, and this is filmed in such a
haphazard way that there simply is nothing to engage the audience. The
first major conflict between an Alien and the Predators is mind-bogglingly
dull and vaguely absurd, due to the way it’s been shot, which leaves no
doubt there is a guy in a suit fighting a big lump of animatronics and CG.
So, it should come as no
surprise to know that this film is irredeemably poor. As James Cameron
said when he learnt of this film being made: “It’s like Frankenstein vs.
The Wolfman, it’s pointless.” And, with hindsight, he was right. In the
end you come away from this film feeling as if there was no real point to
the movie at all, other than to get the fans of the two franchises to
shell out their hard earned cash, which means the tagline of “Whoever wins
we lose” suddenly takes on a whole new and far more relevant meaning.
|